Question: 1
You are a solution architect on a brownfield project where an SAP ECC 6.0 system is being migrated
to SAP S/4HANA Cloud public edition. Two mission- critical legacy applications must be migrated to
the new system. There is some debate on the project team as to the appropriate programming
model to use:
Application 1 was originally written using classic ABAP. The underlying SAP tables that the
application originally relied on have been removed and the data now exists in a new
simplified table in SAP S/4HANA Cloud public edition (to which table extensions are not
permitted). Additional data needed for the application resides in SAP Arib
a. Remote
interfaces exist for both to select the data.
Application 2 was originally written using Java and relied upon tables from the SAP ECC 6.0
system as well as SAP PLM 4.0. The PLM system will be retired; however, the SAP S/4HANA
Cloud public edition instance has all the data needed for the application. No remote
interfaces exist to select the data.
Which of the following approaches should the customer use? Note: There are 2 correct answers to
this question.
Question: 2
A company is decommissioning its legacy ERP system in favor of adopting SAP solutions. The
company is not sure which specific solutions to adopt. The company has three main business goals:
Maintain several unique business processes.
Maintain the solutions with a small budget, and limited time and resources.
Integrate several non-SAP solutions.
Which combination of solutions should the customer adopt?
Question: 3
You are a solution architect and your client has recently completed a merger and acquisition. Your
client uses SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition and the acquired company is using SAP ECC 6.0. For
business and legal reasons, the users of the acquired company cannot yet be added to the global
user directory. The acquired users still need access to the custom application.
Given the attached diagram, which solution would you recommend to your client in "1" to enable
this access?
Question: 4
A customer wants to verify the feasibility of the attached "proof of concept" design. They would
prefer a zero (or minimal) upfront investment but want to seamlessly transition to a different pricing
model while preserving their SAP BTP investments if the design works.
As a solution architect, which pricing plan would you recommend to the customer?
Question: 5
In which phase of the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology is a technology mapping of
customer use cases and SAP BTP integration services produced (for an example of a solution
architecture blueprint, see the attached diagram)?
