Question: 1
During a sprint review, the product owner expresses dissatisfaction with the delivered product. The sprint retrospective Identifies that the end users were unavailable for the project, so the development team built the system based on assumptions of their requirements. What should the project manager have done?
Question: 2
While starring a new protect, the project manager realizes that customer requirements are significantly afferent from similar projects their organization typically executes. The project will not receive significant finding until the work is completed, at which point hill funding will be available What should the project manager do first?
Question: 3
A project manager has an agreement with a third-parry supplier to deliver parts in six months During the implementation phase, the project is cancelled However, the supplier has already started work on the order. What should the project manager do next?
Question: 4
A project team is working on a project's new approved scope. The regulatory team was integral in providing input that necessitated this change However, the team discovers that the regulatory department was not listed as a project stakeholder.
What should the project manager do next?
Question: 5
All the deliverables defined in a project have been completed in the final meeting to approve these deliverables. some stakeholders state that the product does not meet their needs. What should the project manager do?